GWAS & rare-variant genetics
Genome-wide association, rare-variant burden, and fine-mapping for neurodegenerative and psychiatric traits in research cohorts.
The brain is genomics on hard mode—inaccessible tissue, exquisite cell-type diversity, complex splicing, and disease risk spread across thousands of loci. We bring the computational methods that fit it: GWAS and rare variants, single-nucleus atlases, brain QTLs, and repeat expansions, for research.
CNS genetics is uniquely hard. Risk for neurodegenerative and psychiatric conditions is highly polygenic, spread across thousands of common variants of small effect and a long tail of rare and de novo mutations. The tissue is inaccessible, so most work runs on single-nucleus data and post-mortem cohorts; splicing and repeat expansions play outsized roles; and the cell type a variant acts in often matters more than the variant itself.
We bring methods built for that reality. From GWAS, rare-variant, and repeat-expansion analysis to single-nucleus brain atlases, brain eQTL mapping, and colocalization that links loci to genes and cell types, we apply established, peer-reviewed approaches against the field's reference cohorts—and return results documented for reproducibility. Genetic-risk work, including polygenic scores, is framed as cohort research, not a clinical test or an individual prediction.
The computational analyses that connect the genome to the brain—from GWAS and repeat expansions to single-nucleus atlases and QTLs.
Genome-wide association, rare-variant burden, and fine-mapping for neurodegenerative and psychiatric traits in research cohorts.
Neuronal and glial cell-type identification from snRNA-seq—the standard for inaccessible, post-mortem brain tissue.
Expression and splicing QTL mapping in brain, and colocalization with GWAS to link loci to genes and cell types.
Genotyping of short- and long-read tandem repeats and flagging of pathogenic-range expansions like C9orf72 and HTT.
De novo variant calling from trios and rare-variant analysis for autism, epilepsy, and other neurodevelopmental research.
Differential splicing and aberrant-splicing detection—central to many CNS genes and disease mechanisms.
DNA-methylation and chromatin analysis in brain to study regulation and epigenetic contributions to CNS disease.
Construction and evaluation of polygenic scores for cohort research—never an individual clinical prediction.
A transparent, brain-aware sequence from raw data to interpreted association—each step suited to the data type and documented for reproducibility.
Adapted to your study: GWAS vs. rare-variant vs. expression, bulk vs. single-nucleus, short- vs. long-read. We confirm the plan with you before any compute begins.
Raw reads, count matrices, or GWAS summary statistics are quality-checked—call rates, relatedness, ancestry, and batch structure.
Tools: PLINK · FastQC · MultiQC
Genotypes are imputed, reads aligned, or nuclei called and filtered for ambient signal and doublets.
Tools: BWA-MEM2 · Cell Ranger · imputation
Association, rare-variant burden, repeat-expansion genotyping, or expression quantification, depending on the question.
Tools: REGENIE · ExpansionHunter · Salmon
Expression and splicing QTLs are mapped in brain and colocalized with association signals to implicate genes.
Tools: tensorQTL · coloc · SMR
Signals are annotated and mapped to cell types and pathways, using single-nucleus references and enrichment tools.
Tools: FUMA · MAGMA · snRNA references
Where relevant, polygenic scores and research signatures are constructed and evaluated within the cohort.
Tools: PRSice · LDpred2 · PRS-CS
Results become Manhattan and QTL figures, cell-type maps, tables, and reproducible methods with every tool version.
Tools: ggplot2 · LocusZoom · versioned manifest
We select from the field's standard toolkit rather than forcing every dataset through one pipeline. A representative set of what we work with:
CNS analysis is powered by brain-specific reference cohorts and atlases. We build on the community's authoritative, versioned resources.
Different genetic architectures need different approaches. A quick orientation; we will help you match it to your study.
| Dimension | GWAS | Rare-variant | Polygenic scores |
|---|---|---|---|
| Targets | Common variants | Rare & de novo variants | Aggregate genome-wide risk |
| Effect sizes | Small, additive | Larger, gene-level | Combined, distributional |
| Needs | Very large cohorts | Trios / deep sequencing | Training GWAS + target set |
| Output | Associated loci | Implicated genes | Per-sample research score |
| Best suited to | Common polygenic traits | Neurodevelopmental research | Stratification in research |
Not just a results table dropped in a folder—a coherent picture linking genome to brain biology, documented so it reproduces.
CNS analysis follows documented best practices—careful QC, ancestry matching and population-structure control, proper multiple-testing correction, and reference cohorts and panel versions pinned—so an association or a colocalization is real signal, not confounding or a batch effect. Genetic-risk work, including polygenic scores, is framed honestly as cohort research: it is not a clinical test, an individual diagnosis, or a prediction of whether a person will develop a condition, and clinical interpretation stays with qualified professionals.
The practical payoff: your methods section writes itself, a reviewer can re-run the analysis, and a result from today can be reproduced a year from now. We will also tell you honestly when a design or sample size won't support the conclusion you're after.
What neuroscience and CNS-genetics teams most often ask before starting.
Tell us your organism, data type, and question—we'll scope it honestly, including if a different design would serve you better.