Study & experimental design
Design review, sample-size and power calculations, sequencing-depth and platform advice, and batch strategy—before data generation.
Sometimes you need expert direction, not just someone to run the analysis. We give independent, vendor-neutral advice on study design, method selection, and strategy—helping you avoid costly missteps and make the right analytical decisions from the start, whether you engage us for an hour or a project.
The most expensive bioinformatics mistakes are made early—an underpowered design, the wrong platform, a batch effect baked into the samples, or a tool chosen because it was familiar rather than fit for the question. By the time the data is generated, many of these are impossible to fix. A short conversation with someone who has seen the pitfalls is often worth more than months of analysis.
That is what consulting is for. We give you honest, independent, vendor-neutral guidance—grounded in benchmarks and the literature, not in selling you a particular tool or platform. Whether you need your design reviewed, a method chosen, an analysis plan for a grant, a second opinion on results, or your team trained, we help you make the right call. And if the right call is that you do not need us, we will tell you that too.
One relationship spanning the whole project—from design and method choice to review, grants, troubleshooting, and training.
Design review, sample-size and power calculations, sequencing-depth and platform advice, and batch strategy—before data generation.
Independent assessment and benchmarking of pipelines and tools for your data type and question—chosen on merit, not habit.
Detailed, step-by-step analysis plans for grants, ethics submissions, and internal approvals—so everyone knows the path.
Independent review of analyses, pipelines, statistics, and methods—catching issues before a reviewer or collaborator does.
Credible bioinformatics methods sections, sample-size justification, analysis plans, and pilot analyses that strengthen an application.
A fresh, expert pair of eyes on a stalled, surprising, or questionable analysis—diagnosing what went wrong and how to fix it.
Tailored workshops and mentoring—from a specific method to broader analysis skills—so your team grows more self-sufficient.
Independent evaluation of computational claims, capabilities, and data assets—for teams and investors making informed decisions.
A clear, low-friction process—we understand your goal, assess honestly, and give you direction you can act on. No jargon, no lock-in.
Engagements scale to the question: a single call, a scoped project, or ongoing advisory. We agree the format and cost with you up front, and only take on what genuinely helps.
A short conversation about your goal, data, timeline, and constraints—so we understand the real question before advising.
Output: shared understanding
We agree what success looks like and the right engagement format—an hour, a project, or ongoing support.
Output: scope · format · cost
We examine your design, data, code, or plan against best practice and the literature, and identify risks and opportunities.
Output: findings · risks
Clear, prioritised, vendor-neutral recommendations—what to do, why, and what to avoid—in plain language.
Output: recommendations report
Where useful, a step-by-step analysis plan or roadmap you can take to a grant, a team, or an approval process.
Output: analysis plan · roadmap
Optional hands-on support as you execute—answering questions, reviewing progress, or connecting to our analysis services.
Output: ongoing guidance
We leave you more capable—documented reasoning and follow-up—so your team can carry the decisions forward.
Output: documented rationale · follow-up
Advice is only as good as the experience behind it. We bring hands-on depth across the data types and methods you work with:
Good consulting is defined as much by how advice is given as by its content. These principles guide every engagement.
There is no single right format—only the one that fits your question and stage. A quick orientation; we will help you decide.
| Dimension | One-off consultation | Project-based | Ongoing advisory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Format | A focused call or short review | A scoped piece of work | Retained time over a period |
| Duration | An hour to a day | Days to weeks | Months, recurring |
| Our involvement | Answer a specific question | Deliver a defined output | A standing expert on call |
| Typical output | Direction & recommendations | Report, plan, or review | Continuous guidance |
| Best suited to | A clear, contained question | A well-defined deliverable | Sustained or evolving needs |
Not just a chat you have to remember—clear, written direction you can act on and share with your team.
Our advice is independent and vendor-neutral—we are not paid to recommend any platform, tool, or service, so the guidance you get is the guidance we would follow ourselves. We are candid about feasibility: if the data can't answer the question, or a simpler approach will do, or you don't need to hire us at all, we will say so. And whatever we recommend, we explain the reasoning so you can weigh it and decide.
The practical payoff: better decisions made earlier, fewer expensive dead ends, and a team that understands not just what to do but why. We will also tell you honestly when a design or sample size won't support the conclusion you're after—while there is still time to change it.
What researchers and teams most often ask before engaging a consultant.
Tell us your organism, data type, and question—we'll scope it honestly, including if a different design would serve you better.