Publication-quality figures
Clear, multi-panel figures built to a journal's size, font, resolution, and colour-accessibility specifications—rebuilt from your data so they reproduce.
Core Bioinformatics
Manuscript & Publication Support
From finished analysis to a submission-ready manuscript. We build publication-quality figures, draft the methods and results describing the work, and prepare data, code, and formatting to journal standards—so your paper is clear, reproducible, and compliant. You lead the science; authorship stays with your team.
Your results & data in
Figures · draft · submission out
Typical turnaround 3–7 days
Individual pricing from $149
Illustrative sample layout
figures
methods
manuscript
Overview
A clear, reproducible manuscript—without the last-mile scramble
Getting analysis into a publishable paper is its own kind of work—figures that meet a journal's exact specifications, a methods section detailed enough to reproduce, statistics reported to standard, data and code deposited with accession numbers, and a submission package that clears editorial checks. It is the stage where good science most often stalls, and where reviewers push hardest.
We support that stage for you. We turn your results into clear, journal-ready figures, draft the methods and results that describe the analysis, check reporting-standards and data-availability requirements, and help you respond to reviewers. Our role is analysis, figures, and technical writing support—the direction of the science and authorship remain yours, in line with ICMJE criteria, and we never guarantee acceptance or ghostwrite a paper.
Capabilities
What we analyse
One service spanning the road to publication—from figures and writing to standards, submission, revisions, and deposition.
Graphical abstracts & schematics
Study-design diagrams, workflow schematics, and graphical abstracts that communicate the work at a glance.
Methods & results writing
Drafting the bioinformatics methods and results—software, versions, parameters, and analytical logic—detailed enough to reproduce.
Statistical reporting
Statistics reported to standard—tests, effect sizes, confidence intervals, corrections, and sample sizes stated clearly and correctly.
Reporting-standards compliance
Alignment with the reporting guidelines your study type and journal require—so checklists are met before, not after, submission.
Formatting & submission prep
Manuscript formatting to the target journal, a cover letter, and a submission package that clears editorial and technical checks.
Reviewer-response support
The additional analyses and revised figures reviewers ask for, plus clear point-by-point responses for the sections we worked on.
Data & code deposition
Data and code deposited in the right repositories with the metadata and accession numbers your availability statement needs.
The Process
How a submission comes together
A transparent, collaborative process—you own the science and the story; we make the analysis, figures, and reporting submission-ready.
Steps flex to where you are: a full package from finished analysis, figures only, a methods section, or a revision. We agree scope and your target journal up front.
Scope & journal fit
We review the work and your target journal, then map its figure, formatting, statistics, and data-availability requirements.
Output: requirements · checklist · plan
Figure preparation
Results become clear, multi-panel figures and graphical abstracts, rebuilt from data to the journal's exact specifications.
Tools: ggplot2 · matplotlib · Inkscape
Methods & results drafting
We draft the bioinformatics methods and results—software, versions, parameters, and logic—detailed enough to reproduce.
Tools: Quarto · LaTeX · reference manager
Standards & stats reporting
Statistics and reporting checklists are completed to the relevant guideline before submission, not after a desk reject.
Standards: EQUATOR · MIAME / MINSEQE
Formatting & submission package
The manuscript is formatted to the journal, with cover letter, supplements, and files assembled to clear editorial checks.
Output: formatted MS · cover letter · supplements
Revision & reviewer response
When reviews arrive, we run requested analyses, revise figures, and draft point-by-point responses for the parts we worked on.
Output: new analyses · revised figures · responses
Data & code deposition
Data and code are deposited with accession numbers and metadata so your availability statement is complete and compliant.
Repos: GEO · SRA / ENA · Zenodo
Tools & Technologies
Established, peer-reviewed tools—matched to your data
We select from the field's standard toolkit rather than forcing every dataset through one pipeline. A representative set of what we work with:
Figure design
ggplot2
matplotlib
seaborn
ComplexHeatmap
Illustrator
Schematics & diagrams
Inkscape
Cytoscape
Graphviz
draw.io
Writing & typesetting
LaTeX
Overleaf
Quarto
R Markdown
Word
Pandoc
References
Zotero
Mendeley
BibTeX
EndNote
Reporting standards
EQUATOR
MIAME
MINSEQE
ARRIVE
STROBE
Data & code repositories
GEO
SRA / ENA
Zenodo
PRIDE
figshare
Reproducibility
Quarto
renv
Docker
Git
Identifiers & review
ORCID
DOI
GitHub
CRediT
Standards & Repositories
The guidelines & archives we work to
Reputable publishing rests on shared reporting standards and trusted repositories. We prepare your manuscript to meet them.
- EQUATOR Network
- The hub of reporting guidelines for every study type.
- ICMJE
- Authorship and contributorship criteria we follow strictly.
- MIAME / MINSEQE
- Minimum-information standards for microarray and sequencing data.
- ARRIVE & STROBE
- Reporting guidelines for animal and observational studies.
- GEO & ArrayExpress
- Repositories for gene-expression and functional-genomics data.
- SRA & ENA
- Archives for raw sequencing reads with study accessions.
- Zenodo
- Long-term archiving of code and data with a citable DOI.
- PRIDE
- The reference repository for mass-spectrometry proteomics data.
- ORCID
- Persistent researcher identifiers for unambiguous attribution.
Choosing a Route
Preprint vs. journal vs. registered report
There is no single right route—only the one that fits your goals and field. A quick orientation; we will help you weigh it.
| Dimension | Preprint | Journal article | Registered report |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peer review | None before posting | Full, after submission | Before data collection, then after |
| Speed to public | Fastest — days | Months | Slowest; front-loaded review |
| Citable | Yes, with a DOI | Yes, version of record | Yes, version of record |
| Guards against | Scooping; establishes priority | — | Publication & outcome bias |
| Best suited to | Early sharing & feedback | The archival, reviewed record | Hypothesis-driven confirmatory work |
What You Receive
A complete, documented deliverable
Not just a figure emailed back—a complete, submission-ready package with everything the journal expects.
- Publication-quality figures (vector PDF / EPS / TIFF) & a graphical abstract
- Drafted methods & results sections, reproducible and version-explicit
- Statistical reporting & completed reporting-standards checklist
- Journal-formatted manuscript, cover letter & supplements
- Data & code deposited with accession numbers & a data-availability statement
- Reviewer-response support with new analyses & revised figures
- Editable source files, so your team keeps full control
Built for reproducibility, not just a result
We work to the same integrity standards reviewers expect—figures faithful to the underlying data, methods detailed enough to reproduce, statistics reported honestly, and data and code deposited with real accession numbers. Our contribution is analysis, figures, and technical writing support: authorship and accountability stay with your team under ICMJE criteria, we acknowledge our role transparently, and we never fabricate results or promise acceptance.
The practical payoff: your methods section writes itself, a reviewer can re-run the analysis, and a result from today can be reproduced a year from now. We will also tell you honestly when a design or sample size won't support the conclusion you're after.
FAQ
Manuscript & publication questions
What researchers most often ask before starting publication support.
The bioinformatics-facing parts: publication-quality figures and graphical abstracts, the methods and results sections describing the analysis, statistical reporting, journal formatting, reviewer responses, and data and code deposition. You lead the science and the narrative; we make it clear, correct, and submission-ready.
We provide analysis, figure, and writing support for the work we contribute; we are not a ghostwriting or "paper mill" service. Authorship and final accountability stay with the research team under ICMJE criteria, and any substantive contribution is acknowledged transparently as your journal requires.
Yes. We build clear, multi-panel figures and graphical abstracts to each journal's size, font, resolution, and colour-accessibility requirements, and can rebuild rough figures from the underlying data so they are reproducible.
Yes. We run the additional analyses reviewers request, prepare new or revised figures, and draft clear, point-by-point technical responses for the sections we worked on — with the underlying work documented and reproducible.
Yes. We prepare and deposit data and code in the appropriate repositories — GEO, SRA/ENA, Zenodo, or PRIDE — with the metadata and accession numbers your data-availability statement needs, following standards such as MIAME and MINSEQE.
No — no honest service can. Acceptance depends on your science and the journal's review. What we can do is make the analysis rigorous, the figures clear, and the manuscript reproducible and compliant, which gives the work its best chance.
Related
What leads to publication
Ready to get your work published?
Tell us your organism, data type, and question—we'll scope it honestly, including if a different design would serve you better.