Germline variant calling
SNVs and indels from WGS or WES, with single-sample, trio, and joint-genotyped cohort workflows for inherited and rare-disease studies.
From raw reads to an annotated, defensible variant call set. We run whole-genome and whole-exome pipelines for germline and somatic studies—detecting SNVs, indels, copy-number changes, and structural variants—and hand back results documented for publication and review.
Genomics and variant analysis is the process of turning DNA sequencing reads into a trustworthy list of the ways your sample differs from a reference genome—and then making that list interpretable. The hard part is rarely running a single tool; it is assembling a defensible workflow, choosing callers matched to your data and question, controlling false positives, and documenting every decision so the result survives peer review.
We build and run that workflow for you. Whether you are a PhD researcher with one exome or an industry team with a tumour cohort, we align, process, call, filter, and annotate your data using established, peer-reviewed tools and GATK Best Practices—never opaque in-house black boxes—and return results with the tool versions and parameters recorded for full reproducibility.
One service spanning the full range of DNA variation—from single bases to whole-chromosome rearrangements, germline and somatic.
SNVs and indels from WGS or WES, with single-sample, trio, and joint-genotyped cohort workflows for inherited and rare-disease studies.
Matched tumour-normal and tumour-only mutation calling with panel-of-normals and population filtering to isolate true somatic events.
Deletions, duplications, inversions, and translocations resolved from split-read, discordant-pair, and assembly-based evidence.
Genome-wide gains and losses called from read-depth and allele-fraction modelling, with segmentation and amplification/deletion classification.
Functional consequence, population frequency, and pathogenicity evidence layered onto every call so a variant list becomes a shortlist.
Structural variants, phasing, repeat expansions, and difficult-region resolution from Oxford Nanopore and PacBio HiFi reads.
Reference-free genome reconstruction and quality assessment for novel or non-model organisms lacking a good reference.
Joint callsets, GWAS-ready genotype matrices, and relatedness, ancestry, and sample-QC checks across many samples.
A transparent, best-practice sequence—each step chosen for your data type and documented in the final report. Nothing is a black box.
Steps are adapted to your design: germline vs. somatic, short- vs. long-read, single sample vs. cohort. We confirm the plan with you before any compute begins.
Raw-read QC, adapter and quality trimming, and a per-sample quality summary before anything downstream.
Tools: FastQC · MultiQC · fastp · Trimmomatic
Reads mapped to GRCh38, T2T-CHM13, or your organism's genome—short-read or long-read aligners as appropriate.
Tools: BWA-MEM2 · Bowtie2 · minimap2
Duplicate marking, base-quality score recalibration, and coverage/insert-size metrics to prepare clean alignments.
Tools: Picard · GATK BQSR · Samtools · mosdepth
Germline or somatic SNV/indel calling, plus dedicated structural-variant and copy-number callers when your study needs them.
Tools: HaplotypeCaller · DeepVariant · Mutect2 · Manta
VQSR or hard filters, panel-of-normals and tumour-normal subtraction, and frequency filters to control false positives.
Tools: GATK VQSR · bcftools · gnomAD frequency filters
Consequence prediction and evidence layering against public databases, then prioritisation toward your biological question.
Tools: Ensembl VEP · SnpEff · ANNOVAR · dbNSFP
Annotated tables, a prioritised shortlist, QC report, IGV session, and publication-ready methods with every tool version.
Tools: IGV · MultiQC · versioned methods manifest
We select from the field's standard toolkit rather than forcing every dataset through one pipeline. A representative set of what we work with:
Calls are only as useful as the context around them. We annotate against the community's authoritative, versioned resources.
There is no single best design—only the right one for your question and budget. A quick orientation; we will help you decide.
| Dimension | Whole-Genome (WGS) | Whole-Exome (WES) | Targeted Panel |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genomic scope | Entire genome, incl. intronic, intergenic & regulatory regions | Protein-coding exons (~1–2% of the genome) | A defined gene set or region of interest |
| Typical depth | ~30× (germline); higher for somatic | ~100× over targeted exons | 500×–1000×+ for low-frequency variants |
| Variant types resolved | SNVs, indels, CNVs, SVs, repeats, mitochondrial | SNVs and indels in coding regions (CNV with care) | SNVs/indels within the panel; deep, sensitive |
| Relative cost | Highest per sample; most data | Moderate; strong coverage-per-dollar for coding variants | Lowest per sample at scale |
| Best suited to | Discovery, structural/non-coding variation, novel genomes | Mendelian & rare-disease coding-variant studies | Known genes, screening, and deep somatic detection |
Not just a VCF dropped in a folder—every output you need to analyse, publish, and reproduce the work.
Every pipeline follows documented best practices, and we validate against Genome in a Bottle reference material where it applies, so sensitivity and precision are known rather than assumed. Each run records its tool versions, parameters, and reference builds.
The practical payoff: your methods section writes itself, a reviewer can re-run the analysis, and a result from today can be reproduced a year from now. We will also tell you honestly when a design or sample won't support the conclusion you're after.
What researchers and project leads most often ask before starting a genomics project.
Tell us your organism, data type, and question—we'll scope it honestly, including if a different design would serve you better.